Dav MCP vs DrillerDB

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dav MCP and DrillerDB MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dav MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_calendars, list_events, create_event.

Explore Dav MCP Details

D

Choose DrillerDB when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: ar_aging_report, customer_ltv_report, get_communication_detail.

Explore DrillerDB Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dav MCP Developer Tools	D DrillerDB Developer Tools
Summary	AI-orchestrated calendars, contacts & tasks across any DAV platform. 26 tools, field-agnostic.	Drilling jobs, customers, invoices, crews, schedules, and well logs for well contractors.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dav-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dav-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drillerdb": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons