Datto BCDR vs Datto BCDR

In-depth architectural comparison of the Datto BCDR and Datto BCDR MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Datto BCDR when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Datto BCDR Details

D

Choose Datto BCDR when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: datto_bcdr_list_devices, datto_bcdr_get_device, datto_bcdr_list_assets.

Explore Datto BCDR Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Datto BCDR Developer Tools	D Datto BCDR Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Datto BCDR — appliances, agents, recovery points, screenshots, alerts.	MCP server for Datto BCDR — appliances, agents, recovery points, screenshots, alerts.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "datto-bcdr": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "datto-bcdr"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "datto-bcdr-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "datto-bcdr-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons