Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) vs PyreCrawl
In-depth architectural comparison of the Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) and PyreCrawl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search)
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
PyreCrawl
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) if you need specialized Search & Data Extraction tools running via a local process. Choose PyreCrawl if your workspace requires Search & Data Extraction integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, PyreCrawl belongs to Search & Data Extraction using local stdio subprocess. Select Datagokr — 한국 공공데이터 검색 (Korean public data search) when you need capabilities focused on search & data extraction and PyreCrawl when you require tools for search & data extraction.