DataCore A2A vs TokenSave

In-depth architectural comparison of the DataCore A2A and TokenSave MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

D

Choose DataCore A2A when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: address_normalize, address_validate, company_search.

Explore DataCore A2A Details

Choose TokenSave when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TokenSave Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D DataCore A2A Developer Tools	TokenSave Developer Tools
Summary	Chuẩn hoá địa chỉ Việt Nam và tra cứu doanh nghiệp theo tên hoặc mã số thuế, qua DataCore A2A.	Code intelligence for 15+ languages: semantic graph queries instead of file reads. 37 MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "datacore-a2a": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "datacore-a2a-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokensave": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@colbymchenry/codegraph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons