Data La vs Data Edmonton

In-depth architectural comparison of the Data La and Data Edmonton MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Data La when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Data La Details

D

Choose Data Edmonton when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: edmonton_recent, edmonton_query, edmonton_datasets.

Explore Data Edmonton Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Data La Developer Tools	D Data Edmonton Developer Tools
Summary	DataLA MCP — Los Angeles open data (data.lacity.org, Socrata SODA API).	DataEdmonton MCP — Edmonton open data (data.edmonton.ca, Socrata SODA API).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "data-la": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "data-edmonton": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons