Teamcity Mcp vs Runeward

In-depth architectural comparison of the Teamcity Mcp and Runeward MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Teamcity Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: TEAMCITY_URL, TEAMCITY_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: pageSize, maxPages, all.

Explore Teamcity Mcp Details

R

Choose Runeward when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runeward Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Teamcity Mcp Daghis Cloud Platforms	R Runeward Cloud Platforms
Summary	MCP server for JetBrains TeamCity with 87 tools for builds, tests, agents, and CI/CD pipeline management. Features dual-mode operation (dev/full) and runtime mode switching.	Governed execution cells for AI agents: Docker/K8s sandboxes with policy, audit, and approvals.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "daghis-teamcity-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@daghis/teamcity-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "TEAMCITY_URL": "YOUR_TEAMCITY_URL_HERE",
        "TEAMCITY_TOKEN": "YOUR_TEAMCITY_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runeward": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "runeward"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons