Kagi Ken MCP vs Content Core

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kagi Ken MCP and Content Core MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Kagi Ken MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: KAGI_SESSION_TOKEN.
• Primary tools included: kagi_search_fetch, kagi_summarizer.

Explore Kagi Ken MCP Details

Choose Content Core when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: URL, file, and text extraction, PDF, office, ebook, and markup support, Audio and video transcription.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Kagi Ken MCP czottmann Search & Data Extraction	Content Core lfnovo Search & Data Extraction
Summary
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "czottmann-kagi-ken-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "czottmann-kagi-ken-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "KAGI_SESSION_TOKEN": "YOUR_KAGI_SESSION_TOKEN_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lfnovo-content-core": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "content-core"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons