Cypress Cloud MCP vs DefectDojo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cypress Cloud MCP and DefectDojo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cypress Cloud MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cypress Cloud MCP Details

Choose DefectDojo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DefectDojo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cypress Cloud MCP Developer Tools	DefectDojo Developer Tools
Summary	The Cypress Cloud MCP server brings Cypress test result context directly into your AI workflow.	MCP server for DefectDojo: 24 tools with RBAC, HMAC audit chain, and SIEM forwarding
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cypress-cloud-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "defectdojo": {
      "url": "https://www.defectdojo.com/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons