CryptoCultCurt Appfolio MCP Server vs Fullmakt

In-depth architectural comparison of the CryptoCultCurt Appfolio MCP Server and Fullmakt MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose CryptoCultCurt Appfolio MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CryptoCultCurt Appfolio MCP Server Details

F

Choose Fullmakt when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fullmakt Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	CryptoCultCurt Appfolio MCP Server Developer Tools	F Fullmakt Developer Tools
Summary	Provide seamless access to Appfolio Property Manager Reporting API through a standardized MCP serv…	Credential broker for AI agents: scoped, revocable API access with policy enforcement and audit.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cryptocultcurt-appfolio-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fullmakt": {
      "url": "https://fullmakt.ai"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons