Cronometer vs Cronometer API MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cronometer and Cronometer API MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Cronometer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cronometer Details

Choose Cronometer API MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cronometer API MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Cronometer Developer Tools	Cronometer API MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Cronometer — food logs, macros, and micronutrient tracking	MCP server for Cronometer nutrition tracking — food logs, diary, macros, fasting
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cronometer": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cronometer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cronometer-api-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cronometer-api-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons