Crawlbase vs Xcatcher

In-depth architectural comparison of the Crawlbase and Xcatcher MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Crawlbase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: crawlbase_scrape, crawlbase_screenshot, crawlbase_structured.

Explore Crawlbase Details

Choose Xcatcher when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Xcatcher Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Crawlbase Search & Data Extraction	Xcatcher Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Crawlbase MCP — wraps the Crawlbase Crawling API (crawlbase.com, formerly	Remote MCP for X/Twitter crawling and XLSX export.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crawlbase": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xcatcher": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons