Court Records MCP vs Swiss Courts MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Court Records MCP and Swiss Courts MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Court Records MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Court Records MCP Details

Choose Swiss Courts MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Swiss Courts MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Court Records MCP Legal	Swiss Courts MCP Legal
Summary	Search US federal and state court records through CourtListener and the RECAP archive	Swiss court decisions via entscheidsuche.ch, including federal and cantonal courts
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "court-records-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcp.nexlab.net/s/court-records"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "swiss-courts-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "swiss-courts-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons