Costory FinOps MCP vs Prisma MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Costory FinOps MCP and Prisma MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Costory FinOps MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Costory FinOps MCP Details

Choose Prisma MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: CreateBackupTool, CreateConnectionStringTool, CreateRecoveryTool.

Explore Prisma MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Costory FinOps MCP Databases	Prisma MCP prisma Databases
Summary	FinOps MCP: query allocated, correlated cloud and AI cost across AWS, GCP, Azure and Snowflake.	Gives LLMs the ability to manage Prisma Postgres databases (e.g. spin up new databases and run migrations or queries).
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "costory-finops-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://app-api.costory.io/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "prisma-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons