Cost Guard MCP vs Supabase

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cost Guard MCP and Supabase MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cost Guard MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cost Guard MCP Details

Choose Supabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Supabase Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cost Guard MCP Databases	Supabase Databases
Summary	Pre-flight query cost & result-size guardrails for AI agents across BigQuery and Snowflake	MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cost-guard-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "cost-guard-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "supabase": {
      "url": "https://supabase.com/mcp#available-tools"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons