Cortex vs Marm MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cortex and Marm MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cortex when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cortex Details

Choose Marm MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Marm MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cortex Knowledge & Memory	Marm MCP Server Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Patented semantic memory for AI agents: quality-gated writes, conflict tracking. Free trial.	Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cortex-5": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://skynetlab-cortex-saas-mcp.cortex-320.workers.dev/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "marm-mcp-server-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "marm-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons