Cornea, deterministic visual inspection vs BLEA

In-depth architectural comparison of the Cornea, deterministic visual inspection and BLEA MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Cornea, deterministic visual inspection when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cornea, deterministic visual inspection Details

Choose BLEA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore BLEA Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Cornea, deterministic visual inspection Developer Tools	BLEA Developer Tools
Summary	Deterministic visual inspection for AI agents. Overlap, overflow, contrast, quality.	Safe BLE diagnostics, evidence workflows, and guarded automation for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cornea-deterministic-visual-inspection": {
      "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8080/inspect"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blea": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons