A side-by-side look at the Cordon and Mastyf.ai MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Cordon for security work as a local process; choose Mastyf.ai for security over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Cordon when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Mastyf.ai tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Cordon is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. Mastyf.ai belongs to Security and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Cordon for security work and Mastyf.ai for security.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Cordon has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Mastyf.ai is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add cordon and mastyf-ai-mastyf-ai as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Cordon has a quality signal of 41/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 2 GitHub stars. Mastyf.ai has 56/100 (Good) with 5 views, 0 installs and 21 GitHub stars.