Copyright01 vs Random Profiles MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Copyright01 and Random Profiles MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Copyright01 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_deposit, list_deposits, get_deposit.

Explore Copyright01 Details

Choose Random Profiles MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: claim_api_key, get_profiles, get_profile.

Explore Random Profiles MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Copyright01 Developer Tools	Random Profiles MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Copyright deposit API — protect code, text, and websites with Berne Convention proof	Generate fake user profiles and companies for tests, seed data, and AI agent demos.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "copyright01": {
      "url": "https://www.copyright01.com/en"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-129": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "random-profiles-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons