What is the key difference between Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect?

Convalytics belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while LeadFoxConnect belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Convalytics or LeadFoxConnect in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect free or paid?

Convalytics operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). LeadFoxConnect operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Convalytics lists 0 tools with 0 views and 7 GitHub stars. LeadFoxConnect lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Convalytics or LeadFoxConnect in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect free to use, or do they require API keys?

Convalytics is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . LeadFoxConnect operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both convalytics and leadfoxconnect as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Convalytics has a Quality Score of 44 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 7 GitHub stars. LeadFoxConnect holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Convalytics vs LeadFoxConnect

In-depth architectural comparison of the Convalytics and LeadFoxConnect MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Convalytics

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

LeadFoxConnect

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Convalytics if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose LeadFoxConnect if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Convalytics when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convalytics Details

Choose LeadFoxConnect when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LeadFoxConnect Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Convalytics Developer Tools	L LeadFoxConnect Developer Tools
Summary	Read-only analytics for Convex apps, queryable via MCP from Claude, Cursor, and other clients.	Marketo MCP server for AI. 130 tools to operate Marketo from Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Convalytics Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

LeadFoxConnect Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Convalytics Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convalytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "convalytics"
      ]
    }
  }
}

LeadFoxConnect Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leadfoxconnect": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadfoxconnect"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Convalytics is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, LeadFoxConnect belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Convalytics when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and LeadFoxConnect when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Convalytics More alternatives to LeadFoxConnect Developer Tools category hub