Convai Analytics vs Cdt Express MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Convai Analytics and Cdt Express MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Convai Analytics when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convai Analytics Details

Choose Cdt Express MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cdt Express MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Convai Analytics Monitoring	Cdt Express MCP Monitoring
Summary	Analyze Convai sessions, latency, reliability, usage, and provider telemetry via API key.	Interact with climate metrics via Riskthinking.AI's CDT Express API in supported AI chat experiences
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convai-analytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@convai/analytics-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cdt-express-mcp": {
      "url": "https://mcp.riskthinking.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons