Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) vs HiveLaw
In-depth architectural comparison of the Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) and HiveLaw MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI)
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
HiveLaw
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose HiveLaw if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Verify a single contractor license against the official state (or city) licensing portal.
HiveLaw Tools (3)
hivelaw_audit_output
Audit an AI agent's output for hallucination liability under the EU AI Act. Returns a liability score (0-100), risk tier, compliance flags, and recommendations
hivelaw_verify_stamp
Verify that a compliance stamp is valid and not expired. Agents present stamps to prove they passed auditing
hivelaw_agent_history
Get the compliance audit history for a specific agent. Returns past audits with scores and flags
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, HiveLaw belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) when you need capabilities focused on legal and HiveLaw when you require tools for legal.