In-depth architectural comparison of the ContractGate and Weavatrix Online MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
ContractGate
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Weavatrix Online
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose ContractGate if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Weavatrix Online if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose ContractGate when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
ContractGate is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Weavatrix Online belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select ContractGate when you need capabilities focused on legal and Weavatrix Online when you require tools for legal.