Contracko vs Ebenova Legal Docs

In-depth architectural comparison of the Contracko and Ebenova Legal Docs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Contracko when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Contracko Details

Choose Ebenova Legal Docs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ebenova Legal Docs Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Contracko Legal	Ebenova Legal Docs Legal
Summary	Import, review and track renewals on your business contracts from your AI assistant.	Generate legal documents for 18 jurisdictions. 27 types: NDA, contracts, tenancy agreements.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "contracko": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ebenova-legal-docs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ebenova-legal-docs"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons