Continuum vs TeamShared

In-depth architectural comparison of the Continuum and TeamShared MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Continuum when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Continuum Details

T

Choose TeamShared when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TeamShared Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Continuum Knowledge & Memory	T TeamShared Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Shared memory + orchestration for your coding agents. Local-first MCP, vector RAG.	Shared memory for coding agents. Stop re-explaining your codebase every session.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "continuum-2": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/node-%3E%3D22.12.0-brightgreen?style=for-the-badge)](package.json"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teamshared": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "teamshared"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons