ContinueWith vs Dokploy MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the ContinueWith and Dokploy MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ContinueWith when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ContinueWith Details

D

Choose Dokploy MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dokploy MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ContinueWith Developer Tools	D Dokploy MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Install the ContinueWith AI handoff widget from coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex).	Dokploy MCP server for Codex, Cursor, and Claude with compact stdio and hosted HTTP modes
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "continuewith": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@continuewith/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dokploy-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vibetools/dokploy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons