What is the key difference between Context Cloud and Throughline?

Context Cloud belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with local stdio execution, while Throughline belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Context Cloud or Throughline in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Context Cloud and Throughline free or paid?

Context Cloud operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Throughline operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Context Cloud lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Throughline lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Context Cloud and Throughline together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Context Cloud or Throughline in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Context Cloud and Throughline free to use, or do they require API keys?

Context Cloud is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Throughline operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Context Cloud and Throughline at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both context-cloud and throughline as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Context Cloud has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Throughline holds a Quality Score of 45 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Context Cloud vs Throughline

In-depth architectural comparison of the Context Cloud and Throughline MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Context Cloud

Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Throughline

Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Context Cloud if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a local process. Choose Throughline if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Context Cloud when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Context Cloud Details

Choose Throughline when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Throughline Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Context Cloud Knowledge & Memory	T Throughline Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Persistent AI memory with shared team workspaces, typed knowledge chunks, and cross-tool support.	A persistent AI self you own — memory, persona, judgment — portable across all your AI hosts.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Context Cloud Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Throughline Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Context Cloud Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "context-cloud": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "context-cloud"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Throughline Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "throughline": {
      "url": "https://getthroughline.ai"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Context Cloud is categorized under Knowledge & Memory and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Throughline belongs to Knowledge & Memory using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Context Cloud when you need capabilities focused on knowledge & memory and Throughline when you require tools for knowledge & memory.

More alternatives to Context Cloud More alternatives to Throughline Knowledge & Memory category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Context Cloud

Popular comparisons with Throughline

Throughline vs Moxie Docs MCP