Consequential Analytics vs AI Visibility Checker

In-depth architectural comparison of the Consequential Analytics and AI Visibility Checker MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Consequential Analytics when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Consequential Analytics Details

Choose AI Visibility Checker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AI Visibility Checker Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Consequential Analytics E-Commerce	AI Visibility Checker E-Commerce
Summary	Read-only access to your Consequential eCommerce marketing analytics and attribution data.	Check whether AI assistants can read and buy from your ecommerce store. Read-only.
Category & Scope	E-Commerce	E-Commerce

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "consequential-analytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "consequential-analytics"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-visibility-checker": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from",
        "git+https://github.com/krisdiallo/ecom-agent",
        "aivis-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons