What is the key difference between ConsentStack and Epoch?

ConsentStack belongs to the Product Management category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Epoch belongs to the Product Management category with local stdio execution.

How do I install ConsentStack or Epoch in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are ConsentStack and Epoch free or paid?

ConsentStack operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Epoch operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

ConsentStack lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Epoch lists 6 tools with 2 views and 5 GitHub stars.

Can I use both ConsentStack and Epoch together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install ConsentStack or Epoch in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are ConsentStack and Epoch free to use, or do they require API keys?

ConsentStack is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Epoch operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both ConsentStack and Epoch at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both consentstack and kyanitelabs-epoch as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, ConsentStack has a Quality Score of 42 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Epoch holds a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 5 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

ConsentStack vs Epoch

In-depth architectural comparison of the ConsentStack and Epoch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

ConsentStack

Product Management · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Epoch

Product Management · Local stdio

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose ConsentStack if you need specialized Product Management tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Epoch if your workspace requires Product Management integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ConsentStack when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Product Management domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ConsentStack Details

Choose Epoch when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Product Management domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: PERT, COCOMO II, sprint, and Monte Carlo estimation, Reference-class forecasting using a bundled database, Business-day and holiday calculations for five countries.

Explore Epoch Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C ConsentStack Product Management	Epoch KyaniteLabs Product Management
Summary	Set up GDPR and CCPA cookie consent: create a site, publish a banner, scan and categorize trackers.	Software estimation server for AI agents: PERT, COCOMO II, Monte Carlo, sprint forecasting, token-to-time and cost mapping, and schedule-risk tools.
Category & Scope	Product Management	Product Management

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

ConsentStack Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Epoch Tools (6)

PERT, COCOMO II, sprint, and Monte Carlo estimation

Reference-class forecasting using a bundled database

Business-day and holiday calculations for five countries

Token cost comparison across 12 AI models

Schedule-risk and critical-path analysis

Estimate calibration and accuracy tracking

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

ConsentStack Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "consentstack": {
      "url": "https://www.consentstack.io/docs/developers/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Epoch Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kyanitelabs-epoch": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kyanitelabs/epoch"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

ConsentStack is categorized under Product Management and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Epoch belongs to Product Management using local stdio subprocess. Select ConsentStack when you need capabilities focused on product management and Epoch when you require tools for product management.

More alternatives to ConsentStack More alternatives to Epoch Product Management category hub