Concord MCP vs Hound

In-depth architectural comparison of the Concord MCP and Hound MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Concord MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Concord MCP Details

H

Choose Hound when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hound_score, hound_compare, hound_preinstall.

Explore Hound Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Concord MCP Developer Tools	H Hound Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "concord-mcp": {
      "url": "https://getconcord.ai"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hound": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hound-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons