Computer Use vs DrissionPage MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Computer Use and DrissionPage MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Computer Use when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Computer Use Details

Choose DrissionPage MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DrissionPage MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Computer Use Developer Tools	DrissionPage MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Local MCP server for desktop automation: mouse, keyboard, screen, windows, and processes.	Local browser automation for MCP clients powered by DrissionPage.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "computer-use-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "The"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drissionpage-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "drissionpage-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons