ComplyEdge TrustLint vs Hopgraph

In-depth architectural comparison of the ComplyEdge TrustLint and Hopgraph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ComplyEdge TrustLint when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ComplyEdge TrustLint Details

Choose Hopgraph when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hopgraph Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ComplyEdge TrustLint Developer Tools	Hopgraph Developer Tools
Summary	Check prompts against ComplyEdge TrustLint offline rules with article-cited findings.	Verify ANZ businesses against government registers. Surfaces cross-jurisdictional findings.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "complyedge-trustlint": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@complyedge/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hopgraph": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://hopgraph.com/mcp/",
        "--header",
        "Authorization:${AUTH_HEADER}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons