Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Company Screening vs MCP Krs
In-depth architectural comparison of the Company Screening and MCP Krs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Company Screening
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
MCP Krs
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Company Screening if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose MCP Krs if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Company Screening when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
M
Choose MCP Krs when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: krs, rejestr.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Company Screening Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
MCP Krs Tools (2)
krs
1-10 digits, leading zeros padded automatically
rejestr
`P` (entrepreneurs register, default) or `S` (associations register).
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Company Screening Configuration
MCP Krs Configuration