Company Enrichment API vs Ens

In-depth architectural comparison of the Company Enrichment API and Ens MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Company Enrichment API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: company_enrich_from_domain, domain.

Explore Company Enrichment API Details

E

Choose Ens when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: resolve_ens, reverse_ens.

Explore Ens Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Company Enrichment API Finance & Fintech	E Ens Finance & Fintech
Summary	Company firmographics from domain: name, socials, tech stack, emails, phone, address	ENS (Ethereum Name Service) MCP.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "company-enrichment-api": {
      "url": "https://company-enrichment.api.klymax402.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ens": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ens"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons