Companieswise vs Stackscan MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Companieswise and Stackscan MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

C

Choose Companieswise when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: lookup_company, validate_company_number, search_company.

Explore Companieswise Details

Choose Stackscan MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_credits, lookup_company, lookup_domain_technologies.

Explore Stackscan MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	C Companieswise Developer Tools	Stackscan MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Verified UK company lookup & number validation for AI agents — Companies House data, not guesses.	Look up the technology stack behind any domain, and the company running it.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "companieswise": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "-p"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-48": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@stackscan/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons