Compabase vs Run402

In-depth architectural comparison of the Compabase and Run402 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Compabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: request_signup, check_signup, list_plans.

Explore Compabase Details

Choose Run402 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: provision_postgres_project, run_sql, rest_query.

Explore Run402 Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Compabase Databases	Run402 Databases
Summary	MCP server for 3M+ Polish companies — KRS & CEIDG financials, ownership, and industry search.	x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "compabase": {
      "url": "https://compabase.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "run402": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "--yes",
        "run402@3.7.5"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons