Common Paper vs Axp — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Common Paper vs Axp
In-depth architectural comparison of the Common Paper and Axp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Common Paper
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Axp
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Common Paper if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Axp if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
C
Choose Common Paper when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Common Paper is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Axp belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Common Paper when you need capabilities focused on legal and Axp when you require tools for legal.