Common Paper vs Contracko

In-depth architectural comparison of the Common Paper and Contracko MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Common Paper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Agreement search and counting, Drafting and lifecycle management, Template creation and updates.

Explore Common Paper Details

Choose Contracko when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: PDF and Word contract import, Contract metadata extraction, AI risk and obligation review.

Explore Contracko Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Common Paper Legal	Contracko VerifiedLegal
Summary	Create, send, negotiate, sign, and track contracts with Common Paper.	Import, review and track renewals on your business contracts from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "common-paper-2": {
      "url": "https://api.commonpaper.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "contracko": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@contracko/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons