Transfa vs Filestash

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Transfa logo
Transfa
colapsis
📂 File Systems
Filestash logo
Filestash
mickaelkerjean
📂 File Systems
SummaryEphemeral file transfer for AI agents and CI/CD pipelines — upload any file, get a SHA-256-verified, TTL-enforced link. 4 tools: upload, fileinfo, listuploads, deleteupload. Zero-config via npx -y transfa-mcp.Remote Storage Access: SFTP, S3, FTP, SMB, NFS, WebDAV, GIT, FTPS, gcloud, azure blob, sharepoint, etc.
Quality signal56/100 (Good)40/100 (Fair)
Install pathnpx · highRemote · high
Engagement 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 14,451
Toolsuploadfile_infolist_uploadsdelete_uploadrun_artifactsPlugin-driven architecture for extensibilitySupport for over 20 storage protocols including SFTP, S3, FTP, SMB, WebDAVMultiple access methods: web client, native client, APIs, gatewaysWorkflow engine for automating file operationsSupport for custom authentication and RBAC authorizationFile apps for specialized file formats and workflows
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView TransfaView Filestash
More alternatives to TransfaMore alternatives to FilestashFile Systems category

Other servers like Transfa