Codesurface vs ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First)
In-depth architectural comparison of the Codesurface and ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Codesurface
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First)
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Codesurface if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First) if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Codesurface when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Codesurface is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First) belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Codesurface when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and ILOSTAT — ILO Labour Statistics (provenance First) when you require tools for developer tools.