Codesurface vs Football Atlas

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codesurface and Football Atlas MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codesurface when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search, get_signature, get_class.

Explore Codesurface Details

Choose Football Atlas when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_overview, search, answer.

Explore Football Atlas Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codesurface Developer Tools	Football Atlas Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codesurface": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "codesurface",
        "--project",
        "/path/to/your/src"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "football-atlas": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "football-atlas"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons