Codescene MCP Server vs Runvouch

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codescene MCP Server and Runvouch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codescene MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codescene MCP Server Details

Choose Runvouch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runvouch Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codescene MCP Server Developer Tools	Runvouch Developer Tools
Summary	An MCP server that provides CodeScene Code Health analysis tools.	Dead man's switch, cost cap and outcome check for unattended AI agents: health, alerts, runs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codescene-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@codescene/codehealth-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runvouch-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "runvouch"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons