Codescene MCP Server vs Curagent Title Risk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codescene MCP Server and Curagent Title Risk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codescene MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codescene MCP Server Details

Choose Curagent Title Risk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Curagent Title Risk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codescene MCP Server Developer Tools	Curagent Title Risk Developer Tools
Summary	An MCP server that provides CodeScene Code Health analysis tools.	AI title risk analysis for Florida real estate closing documents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codescene-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@codescene/codehealth-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "curagent-title-risk": {
      "url": "https://curagent.io/curagent-icon-180.png"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons