Codeledger vs THOR

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codeledger and THOR MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codeledger when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codeledger Details

T

Choose THOR when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore THOR Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codeledger Knowledge & Memory	T THOR Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Deterministic context selection for AI coding agents. Local memory that compounds across sessions.	Local memory for coding agents. A rule with a runnable proof can refuse a wrong command.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codeledger": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@codeledger/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thor": {
      "url": "https://ko-fi.com/noizieworks)**"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons