Codegraphcontext MCP vs Sanity
A side-by-side look at the Codegraphcontext MCP and Sanity MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Codegraphcontext MCP for developer tools work over a hosted endpoint; choose Sanity for developer tools as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Codegraphcontext MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- You want tools like
repo_graph_query, symbol_impact_path, branch_context_pack.
Choose Sanity when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: OAuth 2.0.
- You want tools like
query_documents, create_documents, patch_documents.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Quality signal | 48/100 · Fair | 64/100 · Good |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Remote HTTP/SSE | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | Not declared | OAuth 2.0 |
| Pricing | Not declared | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 194 |
| Directory activity | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 4 | 8 |
| Full listing | View Codegraphcontext MCP | View Sanity |
Tools & capabilities
Codegraphcontext MCP tools 4
repo_graph_querysymbol_impact_pathbranch_context_packdependency_hotspot_report
Sanity tools 8
query_documentsrun GROQ queries directlycreate_documentscreate draft documents from structured content, or version documents when a release ID is providedpatch_documentssurgical edits to existing documents; published documents are edited by creating or updating draftsdeploy_studiodeploy a hosted Studio bound to an MCP-managed schemacreate_versioncreate version documents for releaseswhoamiverify the authenticated Sanity userget_project_studioslist Studio applications linked to a projectgive_feedbackreport MCP tool errors, missing capabilities, confusing output, or documentation issues
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Codegraphcontext MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"codegraphcontext-mcp": {
"url": "https://codegraphcontext.clauxel.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Sanity
{
"mcpServers": {
"sanity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"sanity@latest"
]
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Codegraphcontext MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Sanity belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Codegraphcontext MCP for developer tools work and Sanity for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Codegraphcontext MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Sanity has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Auth: oauth 2.0. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add codegraphcontext-mcp and sanity as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Codegraphcontext MCP has a quality signal of 48/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Sanity has 64/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 194 GitHub stars.