Codegraphcontext MCP vs Graphlens MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codegraphcontext MCP and Graphlens MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codegraphcontext MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: repo_graph_query, symbol_impact_path, branch_context_pack.

Explore Codegraphcontext MCP Details

Choose Graphlens MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Graphlens MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codegraphcontext MCP Developer Tools	Graphlens MCP Developer Tools
Summary	A paid remote MCP for code graph MCP for AI coding, built to return verdicts, receipts, usage logs,	Semantic code graph MCP server for coding agents
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codegraphcontext-mcp": {
      "url": "https://codegraphcontext.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "graphlens-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "graphlens-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons