Codegraph vs Pensyve

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codegraph and Pensyve MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codegraph when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codegraph Details

Choose Pensyve when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pensyve Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codegraph Knowledge & Memory	Pensyve Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Semantic code graph with 34 tools: callers, impact, complexity, AI context, memory. 38 languages.	Universal memory runtime for AI agents — episodic, semantic, and procedural memory.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codegraph": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vscode/vsce"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pensyve": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "pensyve"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons