Codealive MCP vs Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codealive MCP and Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

V

Choose Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query_intelligence, get_market_pulse, get_topic_markets.

Explore Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codealive MCP Developer Tools	V Veynor — Prediction Market Intelligence Developer Tools
Summary	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.	Prediction market intelligence for AI agents. Live data from Kalshi and Polymarket.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veynor-prediction-market-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "veynor-prediction-market-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons