Codealive MCP vs Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codealive MCP and Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

K

Choose Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codealive MCP Developer Tools	K Kabbalah MCP Server by RoxyAPI Developer Tools
Summary	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.	Gematria with typed transliteration, the 72 names, Tree of Life and Hebrew birthday for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kabbalah-mcp-server-by-roxyapi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kabbalah-mcp-server-by-roxyapi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons