Codealive MCP vs Jsc Typescript Ast MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codealive MCP and Jsc Typescript Ast MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

Choose Jsc Typescript Ast MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Jsc Typescript Ast MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codealive MCP Developer Tools	Jsc Typescript Ast MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.	An MCP that provides an abstract syntax tree (AST) for TypeScript code using the ts-morph library.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jsc-typescript-ast-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "jsc-typescript-ast-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons