Codealive MCP vs Google Maps Places

In-depth architectural comparison of the Codealive MCP and Google Maps Places MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

Choose Google Maps Places when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Maps Places Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Codealive MCP Developer Tools	Google Maps Places Developer Tools
Summary	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.	Allow AI systems to search for places and get business info via Google Maps Places API.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-maps-places": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-maps-places"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons